The Kung

1         Ernestine Friedls assertion that wo manpowers position in rules of order is high the more(prenominal) they argon involved with direct subsistence and distri scarceion holds true for women in the Kung society. Shotak writes, kung women are recognized by men and women alike as the primary economic providers of the group. They assemble vegetable foods from the wild at to the lowest degree three days a week providing the majority of the perfunctory diet of their families and other dependants. (Shoztak,pg 240) The fact that women in Kung society are heavily involved with primary subsistence affords them great personnel and freedom within the group structure of the Kung. Kung men dumbfound bitty control or influence everywhere the womens conclave practices. Shoztak goes on to write that, This economic activity is an autonomous undertaking. work pass do non regulate womens schedules, do not insure them which foods to gather or where to go¦ (Shoztak, pg 241) The Kung women are considered experts at what they do, and the men suck in little skillful to interfere with that which they do not know. In this case, you cannot send a man to do a assembly line that a woman knows best. Kung women attain such paper bulge not only because they are in charge of the gathering, however more so because they are in charge of distribution. A Kung woman does not return to the village and turn over the fruits of her labor to the man in the family. The women are in the right position of allocating that which she has worked for. In addressing this, Shoztak writes, When a women returns to the village, she determines how much of her gatherings will be given away and to whom. (Shoztak, pg 242) In some ways, this makes Kung women the givers of life and survival. A Kung woman can ensure the... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Best EssayCheap.com

If you want to g! et a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay