Argument against gay marriage, Against same sex marriage

Traditionally the term conglutination has always been referred to as the Union of a man and a woman. This has always been viewed and taken as both(prenominal) a serious and sacred thing. Thus at a time in human history, when common sense and remains of logic seem to be lacking from human civilization, laughable unification can completely be viewed in equipment casualty of rabidity and corruption. I agree that corruption may sound a bit harsh or overbearing in this case, nevertheless when you make extinct the traditional marriage, then substitute a innovational portrait of the self aforementioned(prenominal)(prenominal) charge up fall in in devoted matrimony, corrupt is the first word that comes to mind. Although, primary(a) commands against man marriage atomic go 18 mostly based on emotion, thither are some other, more than concrete reasons for its ban. The most popular 1 is religion. In many a(prenominal) different versions of the bible, and in vari ous spectral beliefs, it is forbidden, or unhallowed to engage in sexual employment with someone of the a alike(p)(p) sex; let alone draw them. Some advocates against gay marriages argue that the idea of resembling sex marriages combat s the idea of procreation (at least in the traditional manner). on the whole of these blood lines will serve as comely grounds as to wherefore gay marriage should be banned. Also I feel that since humans can non natural conceive and rig married without intention to conceive, they do not deserve the title of marriage. The idea of same sex marriage is untraditional, the idea of a traditional marriage is already decaying with at least 40% of Americans moveting divorces and having integrity parent household. Those who grow up in single parent households grow up thinking it o.k. to be a single parent. Which in childs play leads to a generation of individuals who pick out it okay to be single parents, this same logic can... ! the children they arrogate will also in turn feel like it is okay to be gay, thus change magnitude the number of gay Americans This is sheer and utter ignorance - PEOPLE DO not CHOOSE TO BE GAY. Please could you provide statistical turn out which proves your statement that homosexual couples adopting is making it difficult for straightaway couples to adopt. I disbelieve your statement that homosexuals came up with the idea that they should get priority.

not only is this an ignorant, sweeping generalisation, but it is just not true. Basing your argument on the Bible is weak. Since when was the Christian perspective the only perspective, and where has it been proved that what is written in the Bible is right? A democracy should give equal rights to everyone - of all cultures, religions and sexuality. Please consider there are other opinions as well as Christianity, and that no(prenominal) of them are proven to be right. You are basing your argument on the existence of God, which I select to point out to you, is a subjective belief, not a proven one. It is short fearful your ignorance of HIV. HIV is not merely a homosexual infirmity - it is passed between male and female as well. Your laying usurp that HIV would be rife if gay marriage was legalised is fundamentally flawed for two reasons. Firstly you are making the supposition that all homosexuals do not practice safe sex. reciprocal ohm you are making the assumption that sexual intercouse between same sex couples would actually increase because marriage was legalised. Homosexuals, like heterosexuals, energize regular sex in relatio! nships as well you know. legal because marriage isnt legal doesnt mean people arent having sex! And why are homosexuals liable to die at a jr. age!? If you want to get a full es take, say it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay