Women and crime

1. wherefore do you count populate judge effeminate addicts more harshly than male addicts, especially female pathway addicts such as the women described in Article #5 in Renzetti? Studies of execration show that serious social problems nuclear number 18 problems which be directly associated with a males demeanour and are non considered to be expected to be a females behavior. The reality is that women make and full phase of the moony participate in terrible abominations and medicine acts scarce as much as men do. yet the situation that women depict judges harshly is because they arent expected to be committing these crimes as men are. 2. At this point what types of theories do you look at are most important for understanding and solving crimes, those nearly people or those about places. What informs your decision? I determine that unrivaled hypothesis can non be absolute without the other, therefore the instruct of places cannot have accu count in formation without the study of people in that certain environs or the other way around. 3.Since 1993 the crime rate has by and large declined. Can routine activites theory explain this? How do you think routine Activities theory explains the violent crime rate in Philadelphia? The routine theory could assert the fact that crime rate has generally declines.

As one factor of a town, government, or organization is changed or outside the whole picture id automatically changed. 4. Is it possible for crime to add even when the number of would be criminals remains constant? If the stripe or rehabilitation or elimination are not factors in those committ! ing a crime the rates of crime to those testament rise because they will act to do bigger and worsened crimes if not stopped, caught or helped. 5. Do you think it is possible to foresee violent behavior? Why or why not? I dont think it... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay